Iran’s Withdrawal From The JCPOA And Its Global Implications

-
In the aftermath of the killing of Iranian General Qasem Soleimani by the US and ensuing series of events, the latest situation is that Iranian has threatened that it may walk away from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) if the European Union referred the Iranian nuclear issue to the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). This is a major implication after the killing of General Soleimani which overshadows all others, as its repercussions could be far reaching and highly detrimental for the region as well as for the global non-proliferation regime. The threat of withdrawing from NPT comes close on the heels of reported decision of the Iranian government that it would no longer adhere to the terms of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), popularly known as the Iran nuclear agreement. 


Iran’s call for withdrawal from the NPT is in reaction to the triggering of the Dispute Resolution Mechanism (DRM), a clause enshrined in the nuclear agreement, by the group of three European countries Britain, France and Germany, which were part of the deal. The fact that the US had reportedly pressurised the European countries to take this route suggests that the continuation of such pressure on the Europeans may cause the actual withdrawal of Iran from the JCPOA. 

Invoking of the DRM and consequent referring of the Iranian nuclear issue to the UNSC may result in the snapping back of the UNSC sanctions on Iran. Iran has already been suffering from the economic consequences of the unilateral sanctions imposed by the US, causing huge domestic unrest. Additional multilateral sanctions would imply more domestic unrest, posing severe threat to the Islamic regime, and possible violent retaliation to such protests by the Iranian government. 

The current conflict between Iran and the US could be seen as the result of the unilateral withdrawal from the JCPOA by the US President Donald Trump on May 8, 2018, despite the regular certification of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) that Iran was fulfilling its commitments enshrined in the deal. In fact, Iran had waited exactly for one year after the US withdrawal in the hope that the European nations would find some solution, failing which Iran announced on May 8, 2019, that it was scaling back its commitment to the JCPOA. 

The primary objective of the JCPOA was to constrict the pace of the Iranian uranium enrichment, Iran’s withdrawal from the same would imply a higher speed of enrichment by Iran. The other vital element of the JCPOA was the transparency of the Iranian nuclear programme and therefore Iran’s withdrawal from this deal would also imply that other nations would not be able to know the actual nature and progress in the Iranian nuclear programme. 

Such fears pertaining to the Iranian nuclear programme may cause other nations, more particularly, Iran’s regional rival Saudi Arabia, to follow suit, triggering the nuclear arms race in the already volatile Middle East region. This may also prompt some other nations opposed to the Iranian nuclear programme such as the United States and Israel to militarily attack the Iranian nuclear installations, causing the current conflicting situation to escalate into war. It may also be underlined in this context that due to its position as the rich reservoir of hydrocarbon, a war in the Persian Gulf region could have severe negative repercussions on the global economy. 

Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif was in New Delhi last week. He held detailed talks with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and External affairs Minister Dr. S Jaishankar. New Delhi expressed her desire for peace in the Persian Gulf. 

The recent statement of the Head of Iran’s Presidential Office Mahmoud Vaezi, exhorting Iran and Saudi Arabia to work together, is encouraging. The countries of the Persian Gulf should work together for restoring and maintaining the security in the region. This is extremely crucial for regional peace and stability, and to obviate the potential nuclear proliferation, the two regional countries should find out diplomatic means to resolve their mutual differences. 

Script: Dr. Asif Shuja, Senior Research Fellow, Middle East Institute, National University of Singapore 



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Data Darbar Suicide Attack

-
The deadly attack on the famous Sufi shrine Data Darbar in Lahore on the second day of the holy month of Ramadan that killed 10 and injured more than 25 people is yet another ghastly reminder that Pakistan still shelters terrorist groups that have now come to haunt its own State. The suicide bombing was apparently targeted towards the elite security force that was assigned to guard the Shrine as the inflow of devotees increase during Ramadan. This is not the first time a Sufi Shrine was targeted by terrorists in Pakistan. Many Shrines like Lal Shahbaz Qalandar in Sehwan, Baba Farid in Pakpattan and Abdullah Shah Ghazi in Karachi were attacked in the past. The Sufi nature of these shrines has made them an easy target of the terrorist groups that consider Sufis to be heretics. The terror organisations within Pakistan such as the Pakistan Taliban, Lashkar-e-Jhangvi and Hizbul Ahrar (said to be a splinter faction of the local Taliban) that took responsibility for the latest bombings in
Read more

US Needs To Relook Into Talks With The Taliban

-
The US has deviated from its resolve to root out terrorism in any form. From July last year it has entered into a dialogue with Taliban. The sixth round of these talks began in Doha, Qatar last week and is still underway. The talks have not yielded any result so far. US Special Envoy for the talks, Zalmay Khalilzad is reported to have said that the talks revolve around withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan, guarantees against terrorism, ensuring negotiations between Taliban and Afghanistan government for initiation of political settlement and a lasting cease fire. Direct involvement of US in Afghanistan dates back seventeen years to September 2001; when terrorists attacked twin towers of the World Trade Centre in New York. Following this, America had declared a war against terrorism. It vowed to punish Al Qaeda and its leader Osama Bin Laden, whom it considered to be behind the attacks on American soil. It also declared to root out Taliban from Afghanistan for providing safe
Read more

India To Roll Out The World’s Biggest Covid19 Vaccination Drive

-
India will begin inoculating its 1.3 billion population against coronavirus starting January 16, in one of the world’s massive rollouts. The first phase of this daunting and complex task will cover 30 million frontline and health workers. This will be followed by the vaccination of 270 million people above 50 years of age and the under-50 population groups with co-morbidities or with high risk of infection. The aim is to vaccinate 300 million, equal almost to the entire US population, by July. This will be an unprecedented scale of immunisation. From developing, manufacturing to becoming a key supplier, India will play a crucial role in the global immunisation programme with two “Made in India” vaccines—Covaxin and Covishield. Covaxin, India’s first indigenous vaccine against Covid 19, is manufactured by the Hyderabad-based pharma company Bharat Biotech. The second, Covishield, was developed jointly by Oxford University and AstraZeneca, and is manufactured by the Serum Institute of Ind
Read more